politicalcivility.com Blog

This is an open invitation to all the Blog Hive Bloggers.  Sutherland is holding a 3rd District debate for bloggers only on September 9th at 7:30 in the morning.  Sutherland will provide a light breakfast.

Format will be as follows:

1. 15 minutes for each candidate to lay out his platform (we’ll do a coin toss to see who goes first)
2. A session for 15-20 minutes, with each candidate getting 1 minute to answer and we’ll alternate who goes first, who responds second.  I will moderate this portion of the debate and keep time. 
3. 2-minute closing statements.  The candidate who is first in part (1) will go last.

I am asking that questions be submitted no later than Friday, September 5^th at the close of business.   I will forward 20 or so questions on to the candidates for them to prep for, but we will probably only have time for 8-9.   Hopefully there will be some time after the debate to chat with the candidates.  Please RSVP as soon as possible to me: lswim@sutherlandinstitute.org

Lyall

I heard about this story while coming into work this morning.  How can you tell a 9-yr old he’s too good to play?  Kids have enough to deal with without being given a complex by adults who want their own kids to win (which appears to be the motivation behind not letting him play).  Here’s the quote from Jericho (the 9yr old):

“I feel sad,” he said. “I feel like it’s all my fault nobody could play.”

It’s just a little league game and the fact of the matter is that in a couple of years the other boys will catch up with him.  Are we so concerned about winning that we can’t just enjoy the fact that we’re watching something pretty cool?  Should we have told Tiger Woods he couldn’t play in youth golf tournaments because he was too good?  Jericho’s mom hit the nail on the head with this quote:

“I think it’s discouraging when you’re telling a 9-year-old you’re too good at something,” said his mother, Nicole Scott. “The whole objective in life is to find something you’re good at and stick with it. I’d rather he spend all his time on the baseball field than idolizing someone standing on the street corner.”

This baseball league needs to relax and let the kids play.  If anything the kids playing against a great 9yr-old will, in the end be the better for it…kind of like the baseball team in “The Rookie” where the coach didn’t realize it, but he was throwing 90 mile/hr heat to high schoolers and so by the time they faced ‘real’ high school pitching they hit the cover off the ball.  Why not look at this as a blessing versus finding a way for kids not to face great competition?

Clinton’s presidency may have highlighted this debate better than any in recent history, but it is again relevant in the debate in California.  I am not going to use this post to talk about my thoughts on gay marriage, but rather to highlight a major flaw in one of the arguments used in support of it, namely “What I do in my private life is my business.  It doesn’t affect society or you my nosey neighbor, etc.” 

My experience as an HR manager gave me ample evidence that this line of reasoning or rationalization is nonsense.  I saw hours and hours wasted, unnecessary confrontations, emotional frailty, and on and on that was a direct result of private lives of employees that were in chaos (either from their own ‘private’ actions or a spouse, child, etc.).  You could go to your average school teacher and ask them who is struggling and why and that teacher could show you a large majority of those children who are struggling have issues in the home.

We are the sum of our lifes’ choices (virtuous or otherwise), whether those choices are made in private of public.  And the result of those choices are manifest in private and public, whether we realize it or not. 

Perhaps the best statement countering this poor line of thinking comes from James E. Faust, who (prior to his full-time service as an apostle for the LDS church) was by profession an attorney and probably saw his fair share evidence of private acts impacting for good an ill society in general. 

First, adults need to understand, and our children need to be taught, that private choices are not private: they all have public consequences…It is simply not true that our private conduct is our business.  Our society is the sum total of what millions of individuals do in their private lives.  That sum total of private behavior has worldwide public consequences of enormous magnitude.  There are no completely private choices.

Wise words…

As I have spent the last several months studying Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution i have often pondered the question, why didn’t I hear more about this in middle school and especially high school.  I remember three US history classes in school: 8th grade with Mr. Rosenthal, AP US history with Mr. Williams and finally, AP Gov’t with Mr. Thomas.  Not one of them came close to teaching me about US history or gave me an appreciation for our Republic and constitution like reading Story.  I believe we are failing in large measure to heed Story’s admonition in the closing sentences of his book.

“Let the American youth never forget, that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings and blood of their ancestors; and capable, if wisely improved, and faithfully guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the substantial blessings of life, the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, property, religion, and independence…Republics are created by the virture, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens.  They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them.”

In education circles (see NEA Foundation — Building A Profession — the NEA has decided not to call themselves a union anymore but by the more modern term: a teacher organization) I have heard talk about really ‘professionalizing’ the teacher function so that those working everyday to educate our children can be looked at on par with lawyers, doctors, accountants, engineers, etc. 

I think this is a wonderful idea.  I know this was topic (professionalizing a career for HR professionals) that came up a lot while I did HR for P&G.  I think it could do wonders to increase teacher pay, to afford teachers greater classroom autonomy, and to revolutionize and inject greater innovation into teaching methods as well as teaching evaluation method research.

But I have to wonder how serious the teachers’ union really is about all this professionaliztion talk, because what is the ultimate result of truly professionalizing the teaching career?  The end result is that the union goes away, because under labor law most full-time teachers would fall under a category of “professional employee” (National Labor Relations Act–NLRA–see NLRA (12) definition of “professional employee”) thus significantly reducing the number of employees that could be represented by a union.  So if professionalizing the teaching career path means the union goes away, how likely is the union to do what appears to be in the best interest of teachers?  History says that survival will out-trump what in the best interest of teachers.

And yes, I am assuming that the increased ability to individually negotiate pay is one major benefit of not having a union; there are the others I mentioned above.  There is a significant teacher shortage, just like there is a nurse shortage.  Guess who’s getting paid better and guess who has more flexibility in work schedules, etc.: nurses because if the hospital doesn’t give them what they want, there’s another hospital down the road that is willing to let them work weekends only. 

So here’s the dilemma of the day: where does the issue of professionalization leave Utah’s teachers and what’s in their best interest, when what’s in the union’s (as an entity) best interest is in direct conflict with that teacher beneficial end goal?

Many of you may have seen the news story in today’s papers (here’s the DesNews version) that North American missionaries will no longer be sent to Russia.  As a former Russian missionary (I served in St. Petersburg), this is sad news, but I can’t say unexpected.  Last year when I was with my wife in Russia, the government was in the process of implementing a ban on any form of open proselytizing.  Putin has a long track record of abusing religious freedom and has used the Orthodox church as a means to strengthen his power by making it harder for other religions in Russia.

I hope those in the media here in America do a better job highlighting these abuses.  In the mean time my thoughts and prayers go out to all those (mormons, baptists, jews, etc.) who now find their practice of faith, other than Orthodoxy, increasingly in the cross hairs of the Russian government.

According to Mayor Joe Thomas, most mayors in Utah are there for ribbon cuttings and to talk up the city, but they lack any real authority to make meaningful change.  One of the major eye openers for Thomas was coming to the quick realization that what most citizens don’t realize is that their local city is really (first and foremost) controlled and run by city employees and secondly (but here again city employees have an undue ability to control) city councils and that the mayor has little ability to be a true executive. 

Thomas did not recommend anything specific, but generally felt that reforming the system to put more control in the hands of the mayor, especially as it pertains to city appointments, could provide a significant check to overzealous city councils and city employees.  He noted upwards of 15 separate conversations with city employees who in Joe’s first couple of weeks each pulled him aside to “remind” him that his role was to be above all else the lead advocate for the folks on the city’s payroll.  Thomas remarked that he made 15 enemies in those first few weeks when his response was that he was the advocate of the citizens first.

I don’t know that I agree with all Mayor Thomas feels should change, but he provided some great food for thought during our monthly Sutherland Blogger Briefing.  I’m interested to see on the Bloghive other reaction to Joe’s comments.

I posted awhile back on possible campaign finance reform.  Obviously the best campaign reform starts with “we the people,” versus some mandate from back in Washington, which is why I am very happy to see that the McCain-Feingold bill continues to see defeat after defeat in the courts.

Most recently the Supreme Court struck down the Millionaire’s Amendment of McCain-Feingold (Davis v. Federal Election Commission) and highlighted two key analytical issues:

1. Certain disclosure requirements were unconstitutional, namely those requiring that a candidate’s contributions to his campaign be disclosed as they were being made, in addition to being reported on the normal periodic disclosure schedule.
2. The court upheld the argument that a law benefitting one candidate necessarily harmed the other candidate because a campaign is a zero-sum contest.

I hope McCain gets some difficult questions about the impact of his amendment on free speech during the upcoming election cycle.  My hope is that ultimately we stop relying on the government to fix campaign finance.  Their efforts have either hurt free speech or made it that much easier for the incumbent and establishment to win. I believe that as we citizens take the initiative to be informed and we can and will bring about the most meaningful kind of reform: change at the ballot box. 

With tomorrow being Independence Day, a “patriotic” post is in order. 

Today I read two OpEd pieces, one from John McCain and the other written by Barack Obama where each puts to paper his own definition of Patriotism.  I enjoyed reading both and appreciated the sentiments articulated on the whole and I recommend both as good food for thought.  I believe there is tremendous value to be reminded of the bigger picture now and then.  It is just human tendency to get so bogged down in arguing over the details that we sometimes forget we’re working on the same thing, a better America.

There is probably only one issue that I would say misses the mark with the two editorials and it comes from Mr. McCain.

“It [patriotism] is putting the country first, before party or personal ambition, before anything.”

If McCain had stopped before the “before anything” comment I think his editorial would have been perfect.  But I think we enter dangerous territory when country/king/state comes before all else.  There is a great scene in Chariots of Fire where Eric Liddell and a English duke where they debated priority of allegiance: king or God first.  The duke remarked that in his day it was king first–God second, to which his colleague retorted that the war to end all wars [WW1] bitterly proved the duke’s point noting the consequence of misplaced allegiance priority.

I love my country, but not above all else.  I am sorry Mr. McCain, but my allegiance to my God and my family come before my allegiance to my country.  And to me this allows me to be more patriotic not less.

Enjoy the editorials and have a great Independence Day! It’s great to be an American.

Because every now and then a string of comments or a topic I write about forces me to take a long hard look in the mirror.  My post from Monday and yesterday and the ensuing comment threads did just that.  After the past couple of days, I am more convinced that Bloom was right that stepping back and looking at our own indignation can be the beginning of true knowledge.  For me, the knowledge nugget that came back again is: the behavior/attitudes which really gets under my skin I find I myself am most guilty of committing or exhibiting.  In other words, that which I most despise in others, I am often most guilty of myself.  CS Lewis said it this way when discussing PRIDE: 

“There is no fault which makes a man more unpopular, and no fault which we are more unconscious of in ourselves.  And the more we have it ourselves, the more we dislike it in others.” [italics added for emphasis] 

Perhaps the most poingnant and sad case of this is where abuse takes place.  I have heard and witnessed several examples of the hatred or feelings of betrayal an abused expresses regarding their particular abuser, and then as the numbers suggest, these abused become the abusers and continue the cycle of violence.  They become the very thing they once were indignant about.   

For me the “sin” I so dislike in others is the rush to assume intent on the part of another.  I can’t stand when some one makes some judgement about how self righteous a post or comment of mine may have been when they know absolutely nothing about me, my heart, my intent, etc.. And yet as I sit here writing this post, I can name time after time, when I have been guilty of exactly such a crime.  My natural reaction is to strike back with equal or increased wrath and judgement in response to one who has inappropriately judged me.

Blogging has forced me to confront this incongruous behavior, and while I have by no means eliminated the tendency, I believe progress is in the works. 

So today I say “thank you” to all those who take the time to post, whether that comment derides or applauds any particular post.  You’ve made me think a little deeper and be a little better.